No, minister

A Tory MP has come under fire  for saying that women are putting themselves at risk of rape by wearing short skirts and high heels.  (OK he's not actually a minister and is hopefully will never become one, but it makes a better post title).  Richard Graham’s comments sparked outrage among women’s groups, who insist that if a woman becomes a victim of rape it is not because of her dress style.  Mr Graham, who in the past likened a night out in his constituency city of Gloucester to ‘decadent Rome’, said: ‘A night out is about having fun without putting yourself at risk.  If you are a young woman on her own trying to walk back home through a park early in the morning in a tight, short skirt and high shoes, and there’s a predator  .  .  .  if you are blind drunk wearing those clothes how able are you to get away?'

In danger? Short skirt.

In danger? Heels too high

In danger? Drunk

Mr Graham further said ‘It’s not about the impact of your clothes on a potential predator in my view – it’s about whether the clothes you’re wearing make it harder to get away from a predator.’

Perhaps shorts are better than skirts because you can run faster in them.  Perhaps you should go about in your stocking feet all night just in case you need to make a quick get away

Safer in shorts

Safer with your shoes off

Joy of tights could recommend that you always go out in tights so you your feet have some protection if you have to take your shoes off and  leg it.

Yes, a silly picture to go with a silly idea

And you should always stick with (a female) mate or two.

Now stick together when you go out girls

And there are handy self defence courses.

If in doubt go for the balls, but they may not always be this accessible

But this isn't point

If a girl wants to go out in heels and a short skirt - and even have a bit to drink - why shouldn't she?

Here is the point for guys of small brain

• There is nothing wrong with looking, indeed this blog is all about appreciating the joy of looking at girls in tights.  
• But don't touch unless you are sure she wants you to
• If millions of years of evolutionary history and the throbbing in your cock makes you mis-interpret the signals - remember No means NO.  NO got it?
• Look if you've got it that bad but she's not interested, go and have a wank thinking about her at home.

She doesn't look that interested

I think she probably is interested

Fuck off, means FUCK OFF

But what if men won't behave, then they should have their balls cut off

Pulling it out for the nice man with his chopper

That will stop the testosterone flowing.

Or if there higher brain centers cannot control the instincts of their primitive reptilian brain, then their brain should be boiled in the electric chair.

From the "Green Mile" - but it is no nicer today

 Also, if the UK had sensible gun laws like the US of A, girls could defend themselves.

Posed by model

Knowing the girl you are thinking of stalking might have a gun and blow your balls off, might put you off the whole idea.  Not so clever being a predator now is it?

Not posed by a model, she could blow your balls off